Someone asks for the signed supplier agreement. Legal finds three versions in email, while Procurement has the renewal date in a spreadsheet. The document exists; the challenge is knowing which version is current and what needs attention.
CLM software gives teams a shared way to draft and approve, then keeps signed terms visible as work continues.
This guide compares 10 CLM products. DiliTrust takes the first spot; the other entries serve different contract workflows.
CLM software at a glance
The platforms below serve different contract workflows and organizational needs. Use this shortlist to see which options may be relevant before comparing them in detail.
| Software | A possible fit for |
|---|---|
| DiliTrust | Legal teams connecting CLM with governance |
| Icertis | Enterprises managing complex contracts |
| Ironclad | Teams standardizing contract workflows |
| Agiloft | Organizations needing configurable processes |
| Sirion | Procurement and supplier contract management |
| Conga CLM | Sales and revenue operations |
| Docusign CLM | Teams linking contracts with e-signatures |
| Workday CLM | Teams exploring AI-powered contract intelligence |
| LinkSquares | Legal teams analyzing contract portfolios |
| Juro | Teams seeking browser-based contract workflows |
1. DiliTrust
At No. 1, DiliTrust suits legal teams that want contract management within a broader governance environment. Its Contract Management module supports drafting, collaborative editing, approvals, e-signatures, repository storage, and renewal tracking. Teams can work from approved templates and clause libraries, while configurable workflows route agreements for review. Automated reminders also help teams follow up on important dates.
A contract management platform is most useful when it helps legal and business teams stay aligned during negotiation and after signing. DiliTrust’s wider suite also covers board, entity, and legal matter management, which may appeal to organizations looking to connect governance tasks.
Best for: Legal departments coordinating contract workflows across teams and governance functions.
2. Icertis
Icertis is built for organizations where contract work reaches beyond legal. Sales, procurement, finance, and legal teams can use guided workflows to request agreements and find the right templates. Administrators can set approval paths based on business or risk thresholds. The platform also supports drafting in tools such as Microsoft Word and Salesforce, negotiation playbooks, e-signature integrations, and a searchable repository for active contracts, milestones, and obligations.
That breadth can help large organizations coordinate contracting across departments and systems. It also calls for clear process ownership during implementation. Icertis is most relevant when a company needs consistent contract operations at an enterprise scale.
3. Ironclad
Ironclad centers its CLM around repeatable workflows. A legal team can set up workflows for common agreement types, collect intake details, and route drafts for review and approval. Ironclad stores signed contracts in a repository, and AI features help users review agreements and find contract information.
This setup may suit companies where business teams initiate routine contracts, but Legal still needs to control the rules. When evaluating Ironclad, test how its workflows handle exceptions: nonstandard terms, extra reviewers, or agreements that arrive from outside the system. Those cases often show whether a workflow fits the way the company actually contracts.
4. Agiloft
Consider Agiloft when standard CLM workflows don't match how a company approves contracts. Its platform offers no-code configuration and point-and-click integrations, letting administrators adapt fields, routing, and controls for different departments.
That flexibility still needs an owner. Before rollout, decide who will maintain the workflows and test how changes affect existing processes. Agiloft may suit organizations with several distinct contract paths and internal administrators who can keep them aligned.
5. Sirion
For procurement, the work often continues long after a supplier signs. Sirion’s procurement offering puts contract information into dashboards and uses alerts to flag approaching deadlines. Its negotiation tools can also help teams prepare for vendor discussions by drawing on contract history.
That focus may suit organizations managing large supplier portfolios, where renewal dates and performance commitments need regular attention. In a demo, ask how Sirion identifies obligations, assigns follow-up, and shows when a commitment is at risk. Those details will reveal how the platform supports the team’s day-to-day work.
6. Conga CLM
Conga CLM covers the commercial contract process from request and drafting to negotiation, signature, obligation tracking, and renewal. That makes it relevant to teams whose agreements are closely tied to sales operations and revenue processes. Companies already using Conga’s other tools may also want to see how CLM fits their existing setup.
During a demo, follow one agreement all the way through: from a quote or request to the signed contract, then into reporting and renewal tracking. This shows whether information moves cleanly between the systems Sales, Legal, and Finance rely on.
7. Docusign CLM
Docusign CLM may interest teams that already use Docusign for signatures and want to manage more of the agreement process in the same environment. Its CLM offering includes document generation, collaboration, workflows, and a central agreement repository. In other words, the product covers work that happens before a document reaches the signing stage and after it is signed.
Check how templates, revisions, approvals, and signed records move through your existing systems. A demo based on a real agreement can show whether the workflow fits your team’s process.
8. Workday CLM
Workday CLM, powered by Evisort AI, combines contract workflows with tools for searching and analyzing agreements. Teams can use it to draft and negotiate contracts, route approvals, and manage obligations. AI features can help locate clauses and key terms across a contract portfolio, while integrations connect the system with tools such as Salesforce, DocuSign, and SharePoint.
That combination may suit organizations that want contract data available across business teams and systems. In a demo, test how the AI handles your agreements and whether the extracted terms are easy to verify.
9. LinkSquares
LinkSquares pairs two parts of contract work: Finalize for drafting and approvals, and Analyze for storing and reviewing agreements. A contract can move from a request through review and signature, then into a repository where Legal can search terms, track key dates, and report on the portfolio. The setup may appeal to in-house teams that want better visibility into both active workflows and signed contracts.
When evaluating it, check how existing agreements enter Analyze and whether the extracted details make reporting useful without extensive cleanup.
10. Juro
Juro is designed for teams that want to create, negotiate, and sign contracts in a browser-based workspace. Business users can start with legal-approved templates, while conditional workflows bring Legal into requests that need extra review. Internal teams and counterparties can comment and negotiate in the same environment, and signed agreements feed into a repository for searching, reporting, and renewal tracking.
This approach may work well for companies trying to reduce document handoffs between Word, email, and e-signature tools. During a trial, test a routine self-service contract and an exception that requires legal review to see how smoothly each moves through the workflow.
What to compare when choosing CLM software
Start with the agreements your team handles most often. Map the steps from request to signature, including who drafts, reviews, approves, and follows up on obligations. Then check whether a platform can support those steps without adding workarounds.
A tool built for high-volume sales contracts may not suit complex supplier agreements or governance needs. Post-signature management also deserves attention: World Commerce & Contracting research examines the cost of gaps that emerge after contracts are signed.
During demos, use examples from your own workflows. Check how the platform handles exceptions, connects with your existing systems, and makes signed terms searchable. Also ask who will maintain templates, permissions, and approval rules after launch.
Adoption matters as much as the feature list. Look at whether employees can start routine agreements themselves and whether Legal can see where requests stall. Teams reviewing usage patterns may also find ideas in this guide to product analytics, which covers ways to understand how people interact with digital tools.
Frequently asked questions
What does contract lifecycle management software do?
CLM software helps teams manage agreements from request and drafting through negotiation, signature, storage, and renewal. Depending on the platform, it may also automate approvals, extract contract terms, track obligations, and report on deadlines. The goal is to make contract status and responsibilities easier to follow.
How is CLM software different from e-signature software?
E-signature software focuses on signing documents and recording that process. CLM covers more of the work around a contract, including intake, template-based drafting, negotiation, approvals, and post-signature tracking. Some CLM products include e-signature features or connect to a separate signing service.
How should a company choose a CLM platform?
Begin with the contract types and workflows that cause the most delays or follow-up work. Compare platforms using those examples, and check integrations, reporting, permissions, and how easily employees can start routine requests. It also helps to identify who will own templates and workflow changes after implementation.
Does every company need a full CLM system?
Not necessarily. A team with a small number of straightforward agreements may manage them with simpler tools. CLM becomes more useful when several departments share contracts, approval steps vary, or teams need reliable visibility into obligations and renewal dates. The right level of functionality depends on the volume and complexity of the work.
Final thoughts
The right CLM platform depends on how your organization handles contracts today and what it needs to improve. Some teams need stronger control over supplier obligations; others want to standardize sales agreements or connect contract work with wider legal operations. DiliTrust leads this list for organizations that want contract management within a broader governance suite. Before choosing, compare a few shortlisted platforms using the same real agreements and workflows. That makes it easier to see which one fits your team’s review process, systems, and post-signature contract management plans.
Ask vendors to walk through the same scenario: a routine agreement and a revised version with a nonstandard clause. Track who requests changes, who approves them, where the signed file goes, and how renewal dates appear later. This comparison shows whether each system can handle everyday exceptions without making the process harder to follow.